Advertisement

Natural Awareness [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
anhydrouslakes

[ website | Anhydrous Lakes ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Why? [Nov. 6th, 2006|11:02 pm]
Perhaps the best question ever asked is “why?” Whether a response to someone’s physical or verbal actions, it has done quite a bit for the world. Newton and Einstein, Orwell and Rand, Freud and Jung all asked “why?” Why do things fall? Why doesn’t this make sense? Why does the government always seem to be evil? Why do people react the way they do? But, those aren’t your questions now; your question is “why make this?”

At the time I am composing this, only myself and my girlfriend of the time read this. This means absolutely nothing is reaching the world. None of the possible intelligence will ever be in someone else mind. Unless that is, if you are reading this, then my goal is basically achieved. I wish for people to know. Not just that the world isn’t flat. Not just that molecules are made of atoms which are made of smaller things and so on. Not just that some people are mentally retarded and can’t do anything to help the way they are. Not just to understand that your “religion” is never any better than the rest. But to understand all of this; I want you to understand everything. I think something like this will be useful to help me keep track of what I have composed and will allow me to quickly recall the information because it will be organized. In doing this I would like to help teach the world that not all people interested in herbology are potheads or morphine addicts. I just want people to not ask “So, uh, I have a headache, should I go eat my lawn?” No, that’s ridiculous. Would you take pseudoephedrine for an injured foot? No, no you wouldn’t.

I must warn you though, at the time of these compositions, I do not consider myself and expert on herbalism or anything associated with it. I just wish for people to understand that what I am doing is not stupid. I want to help the world, not just smoke weed all day. I don’t go to your work and say that being 40 and having a desk job is for losers. It is all a matter of opinion to me and I don’t want a desk job, I want to ease suffering of people and children. Please respect that, and if not, then please keep your opinions to yourself.

If you wish to try to find something useful in what knowledge I do have, I must ask, as I have of many people personally, to keep an open mind. Believe that what you are doing may not always be the right things and that no matter what, you are never any better than another human, or for that matter another animal. Just because you can drive a car doesn’t mean a virus smaller than the hairs on your arm can destroy your immune system. Just because you live in American, Canada, or England doesn’t mean you are better than someone who lives in the Middle East, Mexico, or India. Humans are biologically all basically the same, ask any person who knows a decent amount about genetics. Africans, Latinos and Anglos have very little different about their genetic structure. Think about that next time you walk the other direction to avoid a particular race.
linkpost comment

I support the troops, not the war [Oct. 31st, 2006|07:44 pm]
As long as I can remember, I have never liked the idea of becoming a soldier. It always seemed that I was not the person to risk my life for my country. I long considered military intelligence though, but I came to the realization that they make atomic bombs and the like. Something I have never wanted to do. But, my heart still goes out to those who do go out there. Despite the criticism, and name calling by peace fanatics, some people just want to protect those they love. I respect that.

The “war” with Iraq has never seemed reasonable except for economic reasons. It causes people to ignore actual issues and discuss the war. Schools lack funding, (and if they got it, would they properly use it?) medicine could always benefit from more research, and things like the Peace Corps could always use donations. Fortunately, the government has found a way to prevent “wasting” money on such small things, by having a large deficit. Now, I know I am not one to talk economics, but everyone should know this by now. War is good for the economy; it allows companies to build items to be expended. If we went to war with swords, would we need large amounts of ammunition? No, it would be ridiculous, but we would save money. To cut this part short, as it is unimportant to the topic of the essay, basically, war is good for the economy and thus good for the wealthy and bad for people, both middle and lower class. Think about which you are next time you say we should go to war.

To begin the actual description of way I support the troops, I would like to point out that the troops (I’m speaking of the grunts, not the generals in charge of everything) do not decide where they go; they only wish to either get money for college, kill people, or save their loved ones. While I respect only two of those three, killing people to save a person who is getting money for college is respectable in its own manner. Another simple thing is that how can you complain about the war in such great detail if you have never been. To me, these troops go to war so we don’t have to. My grandfather served in the army the majority of his life between 17-50 as far as I know. He once told me that “people who describe war never saw exactly what happened. They embellish it and when they do that it leaves a bad taste in my mouth.” This coming from a 70+ year old fisherman who has been hit with a stingray barb in his foot and has pushed a fishing hook through his hand, he saw what it was really like. He was there for the stories of having a dear friend die in front of him. He was there for when that man was hit with a mortar with an impact so great that his dog tags couldn’t be found. All of this, is hidden in one man’s mind, and why? Because anything he says cannot properly describe the pain felt. Poets write using massively complex literary devices to the point where no one cares about the content; they just notice the brilliance in the delivery of the thoughts. I respect his choice to stay quiet.

For a moment I would like everyone to realize that Muslim nation is not a united one. The many factions that are constantly fighting are no different than us trying to “solve” their problems. They just sort their problems out on a much smaller, slightly more effective scale.

I’ve known many people throughout my life who say “just drop a nuke on them” when referring to dealing with Iraq. “They are a bunch of crazy people who are just killing each other.” If you agree, I ask you to go there, experience the hell those people go through daily while you drive your 1995 Taurus to work, they don’t have a car, or medicine, or food sometimes. Would you kill a man to give your last surviving child of twelve food? People do strange things when put into a situation like that. Chances are anyway, that most of the people saying to kill them all are of an opposing religion (almost never Muslim by my encounters, because they aren’t just killing each other) and dislike other religions to begin with. I wish to say to them, why aren’t you a soldier, go kill some yourself, go design a new weapon, go do something to kill them. But really, what do they know? They just support the war, and don’t care about the troops. I’m sure one of the people who said that had a son who went AWOL because he fell in love with a woman and ran away with her there. Would you want to kill him also?

Whenever nuclear weapons are brought up, people always get a sense of arrogance. “Nukes have never been used to kill Americans.” Who cares? A single weapon can destroy entire cities, and a college Chemistry student can make one. If the need was there, I possess the ability to level a good deal of a city where I live, with other methods than a nuke also. But I have NO will to kill people. I just want people to see for a little bit that those weapons, if used again, could then be used on us, and we couldn’t survive that. If you don’t believe me, research the strength of current weapons. By now, several of nuclear devices could take out an area the size of Texas. Think about that when you think that we have the most nuclear warheads, why do you think other countries are scared?

Overall, I wish for people to not jump the gun and wish just to kill them all. Some people are going to disagree religiously, and fueling that never helps. Please, try to see that war isn’t the right issue, but if you don’t like the war, please don’t hate those who just want to try to help the world in a way they can.
linkpost comment

Alcohol [Oct. 25th, 2006|05:10 pm]
I am one of many people who dislike alcohol. To be a chemist for a moment, there are many different types of alcohol; the alcohol in beverages and in this essay refers to ethyl alcohol or ethanol (same as the fuel). I do not say it should be banned, as someone might view tea (my idea of a good beverage) as bad and make it illegal. I also recognize that alcohol does have many benefits, of which I will contrast with the negatives.

To begin, I will say that everyone should know that alcohol changes people. Not just in a biological way in which brain cells are destroyed, there is a psychological effect that occurs. The reason alcohol is consumed is because it is a depressant (strange considering depressed people often are alcoholics). By a scientific meaning, depressant means it slows the metabolic rate of some reaction, specifically, the rate at which electrons are exchanged in your brain. Stimulants make those signals move faster and cause people to theoretically think “faster than normal.” Alcohol cause a person’s brain to not register certain things as fast, and in the cases I am speaking of, control over reason. Drunk drivers often speed because their reason does not say to maintain the speed limit, or they hit their spouse because they didn’t realize injuring them is a bad idea. This can be applied to many things. I want you to stop for a moment and think of something someone you know, even yourself, did while drunk, or even under the influence of alcohol, and some consequence happened because of it. If you can’t possibly think of something, think of the drunk drivers who kill people and how people are over served by a pervert just so the pervert can molest them.

Fortunately, alcohol does have some benefits. Wine is known to help with blood ailments and alcohol allows the beverage to remain at room temperature longer than water can. Unfortunately, the later usually refers to vinegar more than actual spirits and tastes quite foul. To some though, alcohol tastes foul to begin with, but in the culinary realm, there are many interesting possibilities. Bananas Foster, Cherries Jubilee and Steak Diane are all recipes that use flambé as a source of entertainment in which the alcohol is lit on fire to amuse guests. Flavor-wise, there is no benefit, it just looks pretty.

Perhaps the largest benefit of alcohol is the economy behind it. Think of the amount of space dedicated to bread in a grocery store, and then think about the amount of alcohol that is stored in a grocery store. What is the ratio of places that sell beer to the places that sell bread in your city? Chances are that bread is higher, but you get the idea of how many places you can buy beer. This keeps many people in their jobs. The consumer buys the beer that the store provides. The store purchases the beer from the company. The company pays the worker to make the beer and pays the source of the materials to make the beer money. Finally, the company that supplies the resources to create the beer pays the workers there with the money which the some of the workers use to buy the beer the harvested the resources for. This economic loop provides a great deal of structure to the economy but falls short of the genius of the tobacco industry which has an addictive element in it. What is most amusing is that drug lords essentially hold up the economy with drug trafficking just as much as the alcohol companies do. Making Busch and Miller no better or worse for the economy than the guy who pimps out little girls and sells cocaine cut with heroin (a deadly combination) to fourteen year olds with no better sense. While a fallacy, it still gets the point through.

Overall, I dislike alcohol because of the things it has made many people go through, but, I have to give it props for overcoming Prohibition and making the world a better place to some, but usually a worse place to those related to them.
linkpost comment

British Tea [Oct. 25th, 2006|04:39 pm]
I have nothing against the British, as I have never visited nor do I actually know anyone who has lived there or who has even been born there. I do, however, have something against British tea. The method of which they drink tea to me is ridiculous; it simply becomes a direct substitute for coffee. Be warned now though, that this is only towards the stereotype that I know of and through some research.

For those of you that don’t know the tea the British consume is primarily black (probably because white, green and oolong teas would taste even worse than over-steeped black tea) from no particular region. The tea is prepared by “putting one teaspoon (the real measurement) of tea into the teapot per person, plus one for the pot.” This is supposedly from the store that the queen buys things from in London, which is pretty authentic to me. Doing this to a pot of tea produces a decent tea mixture, but the method at through which the tea is consumed is the awful part. Instead of removing the leaves to prevent the mixture from becoming bitter, the leaves are strained when pouring into a cup, which after a short amount of time produces a bitter, “boiled” tea that is only drinkable with large amounts of lemon, milk and/or sugar added to the liquor.

I completely dislike this method in almost all cases. To begin, a good tea does not need an extra teaspoon added. That might be so with ancient clay pots that were not fired so the walls of the uncooked pot would absorb some of the tea flavor, but that is not so in today’s society. We are able to use the proper amount of tea per person, 1 teaspoon, without any complications. If you leave the tea leaves in the pot, it produces not only a foul smelling liquid, but completely undrinkable without additives, which I am also against. Most wine purest would say to drink the wine by itself, with no additives to be able to notice the subtle nuances in the wine. Making a mimosa with a $200 bottle of wine does not allow you to tell whether or not the wine was good or not, it just shows you either have money to waste or are stupid. Tea should be consumed by itself, with no lemon, sugar, milk, or even ice cubes added. Impurities in ice cubes often make a good cup of hot tea an awful cup of cold tea. If you wish to add a flavor to the tea, add it in the brewing process. Almost any blend you could want is available for sale, and if you want a different one, it is not difficult to make the blend yourself. To flavor the tea with lemon, experiment by adding either lemon juice to the water (different than adding it in the end) or some lemon peel to the tea leaves.

To me, the British method for drinking tea is nothing more than people taking a good idea and ruining it. China and Japan had been producing perfect tea for years, and with ceremonies that put British tea time to shame. Once again, this is me only speaking against a stereotype. I just want to ask everyone to please not make tea the British way.
linkpost comment

Coins have an edge that is technically a side: Keep an open mind about the world. [Oct. 25th, 2006|04:05 pm]
My goal in starting this journal was to put my thoughts regarding various herbal medicine facts. I originally planned to once a day, research some plant and write something about it. I would eventually become a decent catalogue of information. In researching some of the LiveJournal communities regarding herbal medicine, I began to found that are a few people who actually know what they are talking about, and the rest believe they know what they are talking about because they read a book. I don’t claim to be above those people, but some people have little to know background in medicine and don’t know right from wrong. To be honest, the majority of the people in the world are not viable resources for medical advice, so who do we trust?

I answer this question with the response, not one person, but rather a group within reason. Heroin is well established as an awful drug with a high dependency rate and can become some dependent that the person needs it to survive biologically. If everyone in a particular group said “opium is a good choice for you to help with your chronic back pain.” While a small group, some people don’t know that heroin is basically opium and vice versa. This means that the one person, who doesn’t know the difference, will take opium without knowing the consequence. Those people who suggested the advice might not know the consequences of their actions because they have never had chronic back pain, and they may have all read the same book by someone who was writing a satirical book which they failed to notice because they too were ignorant of the problems.

The same can be applied to politics. I dislike fanatics because they say “this side is always correct.” Voting for a particular party or for the incumbent because you have voted for them before is well established as an awful idea. An example of this can be Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 911, in which it is a movie essentially bashing President Bush, his party, and his methods for obtaining his current position. The White House published a response to it, using the stereotypical “patriotic” themes: flag waving in the back, interviews with soldiers and completely ignoring a majority of the points made against them. The reason for this is that neither group wants you to believe the other person has any benefits about them. This causes people who only watch one movie to believe one side and reject any other truth, once again causing people to make a decision when they don’t know all sides of the story.

I do understand though, that not everything can be understood. Some people just don’t care. I am opting out of voting for governor this year because I do not know enough about the candidates, and I have other important things going on. This might be viewed as an excuse, but everyone makes them. I merely think that if you do not fully understand a subject or topic, please do not claim you do. Reading one book does not make you an expert and just because something was healthy yesterday doesn’t mean it is today. Coffee was long thought of as an unhealthy beverage due to the high amount of caffeine and some debatable natural downsides, and tea was the more beneficial drink to consume. We now know that coffee does contain some antioxidants and for some people, the caffeine is beneficial: would you rather have a tired doctor or an alert one?

For another example, I am a Chemistry and Biology double major. I do not have any interest in learning English or Spanish literature and language. I speak and write in English, but I do not claim to be good at this. I might be more eloquent than the person on my left, but to my right there is a person who might see how to improve this sentence. I claim to understand Chemistry and Biology. I took a CLEP exam and obtained 66 out of 80 in Biology after a week of study and a class I took my freshman year of high school, four years ago. Chemistry on the other hand, I took two years ago at an AP level and can attend tests and pass, with decent grades, without attending the lectures. I help a girl in my class with her Chemistry homework and can explain it fairly well. I do this only because I understand this, and know that I have a good understanding without being arrogant and teaching her the wrong thing. In this case though, there is a method of testing whether or not I am qualified to help her with Chemistry: exams and quizzes. If she fails because of the knowledge I passed off to her, then I am not qualified, if she does, then I am.

To put a completely abstract concept into play, I will give the example of phasing. While merely a theory, it seems to portray a decent example of what I am trying to achieve. If you put your hand on someone, eventually, after an infinite amount of time, your hand will phase through them. This disobeys conventional physics, chemistry, and knowledge. Matter does not pass though matter. Except, there is some chance (extremely low) that this will happen and quantum physicists figured this out and have made an array of various theory involving the basic concept of something improbably eventually happening if you literally have forever. Almost everyone who might read this has no idea about the concept stated above. Now, I am not saying that the concept is true, nor am I saying it is false, I am saying “I bet you didn’t know that.” Which brings me back to my point: what do you know?

The title of this essay regards an age old thought: if you flip a coin enough times, it will eventually fall on the edge. This is usually portrayed with destiny and various time traveling adventures to prevent plot holes. I on the other hand view it as an improbable chance that something reasonable might happen, and only those who understand it well could possibly know right from wrong. But even there we have an issue: what is right and what is wrong when you ask what shade of blue is the sky? Is it sky blue? What if the person is blind? Is it colorless? They could say yellow and that you are blind to the truth that blue is really yellow, so who is right? That is for you to decide, and I just ask that you please research any important decision and not to teach the any other person ridiculous things that you thought you understood.
linkpost comment

The benefits of tea [Oct. 21st, 2006|02:24 pm]
Tea is extremely cheap for the amount that is produced. Cheap wine can be $10 a bottle, whereas expensive tea can be $10-$30 for the entire container. The price of water to make tea is negligible, and you can even use your favorite (clean) coffee mug as opposed to having a wine glass to allow specific reactions to happen at specific rates (breathing and bubbling). An entire container of tea can produce 30-50 cups of tea (or roughly 40 bottled teas, see above), whereas a wine glass only provides only 6 or 8 glasses. Simple algebra shows that high quality tea is roughly one third the price of cheap wine, not calculating expensive wine which would be one twentieth sometimes! Fortunately (unfortunately for some), tea contains only trace amounts of alcohol (specifically ethanol) and will never get you drunk, but tea can produce various aromatics to help relax a person.

Coffee is similar to tea with the respect of being inexpensive; coffee will never obtain the range of flavors that tea has obtained. Coffee does have one benefit though: it has a much higher amount of caffeine. This higher amount of caffeine gets people up in the morning, but also can cause a dependency in which tea (black) can be used to rid of.

Water is the single most important nutrient in the human diet, and without it, humans would perish. Tea, being mostly water, provides you with water, but while still having variety. Carbonated drinks (sodas and bubbling water) and energy drinks provide you with some water, but also artificial things like high fructose corn syrup and phenylketonurics. Once again, tea is also cheaper than sodas (for you to consume, not the company to produce). Tea provides an alternative to drink large amounts of water without gaining unnecessary amounts of sugar and preservatives.
linkpost comment

Drinking tea [Oct. 21st, 2006|02:21 pm]
The amount of tea to be used varies from person to person and from tea to tea. Less black tea is needed that white tea because it is much bolder (although the British would disagree). To me, roughly three fourths of a table spoon (a teaspoon with concerns to volume isn’t the correct amount) is usually the perfect amount for a single cup of tea. But, like I said, it isn’t a precise art, and if you add too many tea leaves, just add a little water to dilute it. The reverse is not true though, too few tea leaves will produce water flavored like tea, which usually should be thrown out.

Iced tea is perhaps the most common form of tea in the United States. At almost all restaurants, there is some form of awful tasting substance they call tea. The tea served at many restaurants is often packaged by companies who supply food products to the restaurant, or are even pre-made syrups that are mixed with water (the same process sodas are made in restaurants). These syrups usually contain high amounts of sugar, masking the awfulness of the tea and some people that unsweetened tea tastes awful because of the lack of sugar. Tea does not need sugar in my opinion, but that will be discussed later on. Good iced tea however, can easily be made at home from any kind of tea. I find that herbal tea lasts the longest, and white tea tends to go bad after a couple days, so keep this in mind while preparing tea. Like all tea, iced tea still needs to steep, but it depends on the method of production the length of steeping.

For the quickest method, put some ice cubes into 1 cup of water, and add twice the amount of tea leaves necessary to 1 cup of boiling water. After the tea has steeped for the appropriate time (depends on the type of tea, and the quality), strain the hot tea and pour the liquor (liquid that the tea leaves has flavored) into the cold water. Make sure to use a vessel that can safely cool then heat rapidly (glass usually isn’t that good at this if it is cheap). This produces a cloudy, yet quick method of preparing ice tea and takes some practicing to end up with good tea. I prefer the slower, but lazier method.

This method involves using water bottles. I find that the ones roughly the height of 20 oz (sorry metric people) drinks usually work the best. Buy a pack of 24 to cut down on cost and just keep the unused ones on top of your refrigerator or in a closet somewhere. To begin, unscrew the cap off one of the bottles and place aside. Funnel in the appropriate amount of tea and put the cap back on. Using a tea bag makes the process all the simpler, just fold it in half (make sure not split the bag) and place it in the water. I find that paper funnels work the best, but don’t be scared of spilling, tea is kind of cheap even for the high quality teas. I don’t recommend doing this to large leaf teas, as it is kind of difficult, so practice on small tea leaves first. Never crush the leaves, or use crushed leaves for this. Those are for the garden (organic compost anyone?). This method produces a clear liquid that is good after seven hours, great after 12 and lame after 48, so I recommend only preparing two tea bottles per person per every couple days.

Hot tea on the other hand, is quick and usually consistent if the proper steps are followed. First, the appropriate tea for the situation must be selected, and then the tea must be put into boiling water (about a minute and a half in the microwave for a single cup) for the appropriate amount of time. For white tea, usually 30 to 90 seconds, green 1 to 3 minutes, oolong 2 to 4 minutes, and black 3 to 5 minutes. Being only a guideline, I encourage you to experiment and not be afraid of throwing out bad tea.
linkpost comment

Background [Oct. 21st, 2006|02:20 pm]
There are four types of teas: black, oolong, green and white. White tea (almost always new growth buds) has undergone no oxidation and is dried immediately. Green tea only goes through a minimal amount of oxidation by application of heat; either with steam or by dry cooking in hot pans. The tea is then left to air dry and is then packaged. Oolong is simply a tea leaf that is oxidized somewhere between the amount that green tea is oxidized and black tea is oxidized. Black teas are completely oxidized and have the deepest flavor of all the teas. Because black tea is completely oxidized, it has the highest amount of caffeine with respect to the various kinds of tea, but is still greatly under the amount that coffee provides.

White tea is a relatively new idea to the tea world (in America) and produces extremely subtle flavors. The lack of oxidation is responsible for the subtle flavors and also the highest amount of anti-oxidants in the four different kinds of tea. Because of the subtle flavors, white tea is often combined with jasmine (either by letting the tea dry near a jasmine orchard or by mixing jasmine petals with the tea), vanilla, pear, or other mild flavors to create a completely unique blend.

Green tea has a number of unique production methods. Genmaicha is green tea (most likely not an extremely high quality to begin with) mixed with toasted rice to give it a completely unique “earthy” flavor that is not reproducible in the other kinds of tea.

Oolong is an extremely diverse type of tea, and is consequently hard to describe. It produces some of the subtle, woodsy flavors of green tea, while maintaining the boldness of black tea.

Black tea is the most common tea and is what is usually made into iced tea. Due to the fact that iced tea is cold, the taste buds are not able to pick up the awful flavors of some of the CTC (cut-torn-crush) tea leaves and shouldn’t be appealing to the tea connoisseur. Black tea produces deep rich flavors that I personally compare to wine.

Chai tea is a blend of black tea with a variety of spices, usually things like clove and other “apple cider spices.” It produces a different warming effect in that usually the highly spiced beverage contains expectorates that help clear congestion. Because chai tea is heavily spiced in comparison to other teas, it is commonly liked by coffee drinkers, but provides little to no caffeine.

Tea bags are usually an extremely convenient way to prepare tea, except, they usually produce lower quality tea in sacrifice for consistency. I have found that soaking the tea bag in cool water draws out some of the powdered tea leaves and produces a better tasting tea. Do not do this process with whole tea leaves in a bag though, only with crushed or shredded tea leafs in a tea bag.
linkpost comment

Tea [Oct. 21st, 2006|01:01 pm]
While the existence of tea is nothing new, actually older than any soft drink and older than many alcoholic drinks, tea is still a subject that many people do not know very much about. Camellia sinensis is the plant that tea is actually made from. Herbal teas (or tisanes) are made from various herbs and are usually a blend, not from the Camellia sinensis plant.
This is only the beginning to a series of posts regarding tea, its benefits, and its consumption.
linkpost comment

Schools of Herbal Medicine [Sep. 28th, 2006|04:10 pm]
Because it is difficult to find a college specializing in herbal medicine and the like, I have compiled a list of schools.
Direct links to schools:
http://www.7song.com/
Ithaca, NY

http://www.bridgeport.edu/pages/1.asp
Bridgeport, CT

http://www.ccnh.edu/default.asp
Birmingham, AL

http://www.ncnm.edu/
Portland, OR

http://www.ccnm.edu/
Toronto, ON, Canada

http://www.bastyr.edu/
Seattle, WA

http://www.achs.edu/
Portland, OR
Online

http://www.scnm.edu/
Tempe, AZ

http://www.ocom.edu/
Portland, OR

Search Engines:
http://www.aanmc.org/
Association of Accredited Naturopathic Medical Colleges is a collection of some of the schools listed above.

http://www.naturopathicschools.com/
Directory of Naturopathic Schools in the United States

http://programs.gradschools.com/usa/naturopathic_medicine.html
A collection of Naturopathic graduate schools
linkpost comment

Basic Information for the masses [Sep. 27th, 2006|05:27 pm]
I thought it would be smart to do something like this. To say, "this is basically what herbalism is." So I am doing this. Not exactly the scientific cream of the crop, but certainly better than what most people think. It also may not be right, but like I said, it doesn't have to be for many people to believe it.
1) An herb is defined as a beneficial plant. Unfortunately, optimists can make almost any plant useful. Bamboo for instance doesn't have any medicinal benefits, but it does however make cheap buildings and clothes, while being completely renewable and almost completely harmless to the soil.

2) Modern medicine is only better than herbalism because herbalism is experimental. It would be like someone going to Mars by themselves with proof they went and came back with results. You cannot call it fact until it is massively know and accepted. He could say "THERE WERE THESE LITTLE GREY MAN AND THEY GAVE ME COOKIES!" We can't say "No, that's dumb," because we don't have any proof against him, so we have to go there and prove him wrong. Kind of like Freud for you psychoanalytical people. All experimental things fall to actual facts that have been proven. Also, things that are proven become concrete, herbalism is kind of like giving a room full of kids a bunch of legos and telling them to build something. Not a single one will be the same, but some will have similar elements. This analogy is kind of how herbal doctors function, and slightly in general how doctors function.

3) Modern medicine evolved from herbal medicine. Things that "cured" the headaches of tribes in the middle of a rainforest eventually became our painkillers once they are tested in a lab. This stuff doesn't happen as someone saying, "instead of only having five carbons in this polymer, I will use six." It involves a basic idea, then testing the raw herb. Once the herb is tested and proven for a particular benefit, it is then broken down chemically and analyzed to find what exactly causes these affects. Those chemicals are then isolated and tested individually. If it works, then a new OTC or RX can be made from it.

4) Herbal medicine has been around as long as civilization has existed. If you want to think about it this way, herbs are beneficial plants and the animals on the bottom of the food chain eat plants to satisfy hunger. According to this statement all plants that are consumed in one way or another are herbs to some animal, and is a way to get rid of hunger, thus herbal medicine is conducted by animals at a primitive level also.

5) Herbal medicine is NOT "let's go eat this and see what happens." People die that way, even today. People died and we started to notice that certain plants made you die, and certain ones made things better. There is the history of herbal medicine in a nutshell. People tried things and either noted that they died or didn't. (Note: Governments do the same thing with people's opinions).

6) Native Americans are not able to use magic or something like that to enhance herbal functions. They just have a lot of knowledge regarding the history of what killed and what made you see Salvador Dali pictures. Western (European) civilization lost a lot of it due to the need to kill people they thought of as witches. Herbalism was and is not true medicine and is not seen as fact and was considered heresy by the church and was basically a casualty of war. From what I know, it stems from the time of King Arthur when the Roman Catholic Empire was taking over Europe and was fighting the people they thought were witches and warlocks. Because of this need to kill everyone who did things these heretics did, things like the Salem witch trials happened.

7) Herbal medicine will save the world. Whether it be by destroying it, curing it or reviving it; herbalism is the only form of medicine than could survive an apocalypse or cause it. A cloud of Deadly Nightshade gas could kill societies as easily as a radiation cloud could, and would not harm the land permanently.

8) Do not practice herbal medicine unless you have a VERY good understanding of it and are only dealing with small amount of harmless chemicals. Rosemary, thyme, nutmeg, aloe are all good for starters. Vinca, Nightshade, Poppy and the like are not good for anyone at all.

9) Drugs are technically a form of herbal medicine. Hallucinogens, opium (morphine and codeine), pot/weed/cannabis (THC), wine/beer/spirits (ethanol) are all ancient forms of doing something useful with what you had.
link1 comment|post comment

i swore i would never do this again [Sep. 26th, 2006|02:07 am]
I'm pretty sure I've done that to many things. This however, will be for my use for herbalism, homeopathy and the like.
It will just be a place I can put things:
links, files, information that I find informing.
I think something like this will be useful in my plans to help teach the world that not all people interested in herbology are potheads or morphine-fiends.
I just want people to not be like
"So uh, I have a headache, should I go eat my lawn?"
No, that's stupid.
Do you take Tussin for an injured foot?
No, no you don't.
link1 comment|post comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]

Advertisement